|
|
|
|
|
To contact us: |
|
· Huge amount of evidence in childs favour · Huge cost to tax payer · Child still receiving no education · The very system that should be supporting these children is harming them · Costly reports and assessments are ignored · The current law does not seem to have helped or protected this child · Despite speech and language therapy being under educational needs in the
statement from 1996, the child received two sessions at the beginning of this
year and that is it! · Parents cannot get legal representation at tribunals · Where are the rights of the child in all of this · The cost of sending the child to the residential school of choice would
be only £9,000 more than sending to an unsuitable mainstream school, far less
than the current legal bill · |
KEY POINTS
|
|
Experts opinions of those professionals who have worked with this
child “I am concerned that *** seems to be making
little progress academically” “It is difficult for me to imagine that a
mainstream school can responsibly suggest that they can be successful with
this child” “The gap between the chronological age and the
reading age(for example) is widening” “It seems apparent that the provision offered is based more on
resources than on this child's individual needs” “ I am also concerned that while two of the
most important provisions for this child's development(speech and language
therapy & Occupational therapy) they were never provided. It is therefore
not unexpected that we all have serious concerns about the proposed
provisions”. “***LEA has not and cannot provide the
appropriate provision to meet this child's needs. The child has regressed
academically, behaviourally and socially.” “It is my view this child should be considered
for placement in an educational setting that allows for continuity of care
throughout the whole day (residential education).” |
bravenet.com